-
Archives
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- March 2022
- December 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- April 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- August 2008
- April 2008
- August 2006
- July 2006
- May 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- July 2002
- June 2002
- February 2002
- August 2001
- July 2001
- June 2001
- July 1998
- June 1998
- May 1998
- March 1998
-
Meta
180: From Pro Choice to Pro Life . . . In Seconds!
This entry was posted in Topical Studies. Bookmark the permalink.

Yes, but what would Jesus do? Would he stand with those seaking fairness and equality or the wealthy elite?
Neither. You cannot ascribe current political assumptions to the first century. When asked should Jews pay taxes to Rome, Jesus asked for a coin. He then asked whose likeness was struck upon the coin. The answer was, Caesar. Jesus astutely said, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” In other words, obey the rules of government. We can affirm that with another verse of Scripture, Romans 13:1, “Everyone must submit to governing authorities. For all authority comes from God, and those in positions of authority have been placed there by God.” But there is a caveat. When Peter and John, both Disciples of Christ, were commanded to stop preaching in the name of Jesus, their answer was, “Do you think God wants us to obey you rather than Him? We cannot stop telling about everything we have seen and heard” (Acts 4:19-20). In other words follow the rules of Government unless they directly oppose the will of God.
The terms, fairness and equality, as they are used by the socialists today mean everyone is exactly the same, no matter their job, experience, competency, talents, etc., and all should have the same amount of stuff, money, food, shelter, transportation, etc. This is egalitarianism. Time and again governments have tried egalitarianism, including the government of the Pilgrims at Plymouth. It simply does not work. While they were under this egalitarian government, the Pilgrims nearly starved. When Governor Bradford gave each family their own property to farm, supplies became plentiful. There was enough left over to pay off the debt they incurred traveling to the New World. Each Pilgrim had an incentive to better himself when he owned his own property and produced his own goods.
Yes, everyone in an egalitarian society is equal, that is, equally poor. No I do not believe Jesus would support egalitarianism.